• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    67 hours ago

    Wikipedia says they broke a window to enter, and that can be heard on audio—I’m not trying to argue with everything, but how is a closed window that had to be broken for entry not a barrier?

    • @Madison420
      link
      -47 hours ago

      They did, read the testimony. He has the window blocked and he removed it so the window would be the easiest way to enter.

      He set a trap, there’s no legitimate purpose for that.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        96 hours ago

        The dude clearly murdered them and had violent vigilante fantasies—I don’t argue that one bit.

        That said, they still came up to his house, broke a window, and entered with the intention to burgle it. It doesn’t really matter if the window was previously blocked or made of paper—breaking and entering with the intention of burglary is a crime, and having no block on a window isn’t enticement to have your house burgled.

        Again, before anyone thinks I’m defending him, I fully agree that he is a murderer. I just think the burglars weren’t innocent either. In Reddit lingo, “everyone sucks here”.

        • @Madison420
          link
          -86 hours ago

          You are defending him boss.

          The jury took less than three hours to establish as a matter of fact that none of the shootings were justified or in defense. It’s a fact now, your opinion is just that… An opinion and one not backed by either statute or the court case.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            34 hours ago

            I already requested the link for the info you are referencing, and I have told you where I found mine. Please provide a source, I would like to learn.

            • @Madison420
              link
              -5
              edit-2
              4 hours ago

              I did!

              The court transcripts which I’ve read, you haven’t and I’m not your goddamn mom. You know the source, go get it for yourself.

              Ed: also https://lemmy.world/comment/14056314

              Maybe read more, I already said I’d look for my copy. I’m not magic and I’m not your mom, it will take some time and I also no no legitimate reason to do your legwork. I directed to where and how to gain the transcript to which you said you simply don’t have the time. So what’s your actual complaint, that I’m not doing it fast enough for the lord-god whatever the fuck your name is?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          -76 hours ago

          If you’re arguing that both the murderer and murder victims “suck” maybe you need to rethink your priorities…

            • @Madison420
              link
              1
              edit-2
              4 hours ago

              Well that’s strange because one is a convicted murderer.

                • @Madison420
                  link
                  127 minutes ago

                  What do you mean, by any system one is a murderer one is a burglar what’s not to agree with?

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                04 hours ago

                And the others probably would have been convicted of burglary if they lived, what’s your point?

                • @Madison420
                  link
                  03 hours ago

                  Absolutely. If you think unarmed burglary and premeditated murder are the same morally and legally I cannot agree.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    03 hours ago

                    Never said that. You are taking everything I say and twisting it.

                    The man is a murderer, the intruders are burglars, everyone sucks here. That is the only point I have ever made in this thread.