• snooggums
    link
    English
    141 month ago

    Honestly, it’s a waste of breath to have an opinion on Lemmy.

    Says the guy who agrees people shouldn’t post their opinions about the hero who stopped the mass murdering CEO.

    • @zfirerose
      cake
      link
      English
      -61 month ago

      lol, I never said that. You can say whatever the hell you want and I couldn’t care less. But expressing an alternate opinion on Lemmy does come with most people shunning you and calling you a bootlicker, which from what I’ve seen only discourages diversification. But I guess that’s a good thing for you guys? Haha

      • @Breezy
        link
        English
        61 month ago

        Naw lemmy for the most part is pretty cool. If you’re getting called out for being a bootlicker by a bunch of replies, it probably means you are one. Which you are, btw.

        • @zfirerose
          cake
          link
          English
          01 month ago

          Case in point. Lemmy is pretty cool if your opinions align with theirs.

          • @Breezy
            link
            English
            -11 month ago

            Thats not right. Just because i think lemmy is cool doesnt mean its because my opinions align well. In fact i talk a lot of dumb shit and get down voted all the time. Im actually one of the more drunk assholes who post on here.

        • OpenStars
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -31 month ago

          As I said, in my very first sentence. So… good?

      • Optional
        link
        English
        41 month ago

        Blocks and filters make it much better.

        • @zfirerose
          cake
          link
          English
          31 month ago

          I agree, it’s more tolerable.

        • OpenStars
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 month ago

          New users won’t know how to do that… but yes.

      • OpenStars
        link
        fedilink
        English
        01 month ago

        You: I wish I were free to have an independent opinion…

        Them: Your “freedom” is the right to stfu and agree with what I say…

        Like, [email protected] exists if people want to chat about overthrowing stuff. “Post humorous takes on capitalism and the states which prop it up. Memes, shitposting… [etc.]”. Meanwhile, Rule #1 of [email protected] states “Be Respectful”, and Rule #5 is “No Enciting Harassment” so… I guess mods shouldn’t follow the rules then, b/c facts don’t matter?

        Then they will get mad that people choose the bear (Reddit) over the man (bEcAuSe We’Re SuCh NiCe PeOpLe ThO).

        • @zfirerose
          cake
          link
          English
          11 month ago

          I have noticed the irony in most of these, yes. And if mods do enforce the rules as they should (like the .world mods) they get criticized. There’s no winning, haha

          • OpenStars
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 month ago

            These “alternative fact” tactics WORK! Or else people would not bother with them. The Information Age is over, now we have entered the Disinformation Era, where it is much harder to distinguish truth from fiction.

            See the entire series of Innuendo Studios bc we’re going to be seeing those approaches brushed off and re-used in this next phase.

            Two instances I know of that are fighting back are PieFed and dubvee.org.