I think that it will not be waged between North and South for state rights, but rather between Republicans and Democrats for human rights. It will happen before our 250th anniversary in 2026.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -171 year ago

    Enforcing policy is dictating lives though, how about just use a different name for marriage and do a different ritual? Unless that’s only if you actually only care for inheritance laws.

    • @Ensign_Crab
      link
      English
      131 year ago

      how about just use a different name for marriage and do a different ritual?

      So you want a separate name and ritual for people who aren’t like you want them to be, and expect everyone to believe that it will be equal?

      No. Everyone knows how “separate but equal” pans out in the “equal” department.

        • @Ensign_Crab
          link
          English
          131 year ago

          you have no problem with people identifying as a washing machine

          Oh neat. Another variant on the “attack helicopter” bigotry.

            • deejay4am
              link
              English
              21 year ago

              Isn’t it lovely when one side tries to paint it like they’re SO innocent?

              “I’m just talking about the soft genocide of people born into the wrong body bro. Don’t worry we’ll ease into pulverizing all the rest of the cripples next until only proud strong genetic linages with blond hair and blue eyes remain so that humanity can prosper in in absolute monochromatic conformity! That’s an opinion men have because they’re strong.”

              Don’t lie, I am not far off.

    • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️
      link
      fedilink
      English
      5
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It’s not an infringement of your rights to stop you from beating/killing people you don’t like. It’s not an infringement of your rights to allow others to do things you don’t want to do yourself.

        • @InverseParallax
          link
          English
          81 year ago

          We tried that, several times, each time the south did something stupid like dredd Scott or Jim crow or the kkk.

          The only way to stop them from trying to keep brown people as pets was to send soldiers, they don’t understand any other language.

        • iByteABit
          link
          fedilink
          61 year ago

          They don’t though, otherwise there would be no need for a justice system altogether. There are “people” out there that have wet dreams of lgbt people being incriminated and women having less rights than men, the rest of society should be protected from them instead of putting them in government positions.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            -101 year ago

            I think deep down that is what you want, I think you want lgbt people to be incriminated and women to have less rights because then you have a bogeyman to fight against.

            • Kata1yst
              link
              fedilink
              71 year ago

              So much for a rational discussion. Great showing for yourself and others with similar beliefs.

            • iByteABit
              link
              fedilink
              11 year ago

              That’s some exceptional mental gymnastics right there, keep thinking like that and you’ll go far

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -101 year ago

            No it’s not but you should be genuinely good and not down the barrel of a gun with coercion or threats.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              41 year ago

              I’m going to guess you’re Christian. I’m also going to guess you don’t see one bit of irony with your statement.

    • deejay4am
      link
      English
      41 year ago

      Giving trans people the right to healthcare only affects their lives. So tell me again how this terrible government overreach occurs when we say “you can’t make laws to restrict someone’s freedom”?

      You can’t, because it doesn’t.