So Oath is not a legacy game, because there’s no permanent changes to the game (no destruction, no stickers, no writing, nothing). It’s not a campaign game either since there’s no overarching narrative covering multiple games (well, not one provided by the game, at least). So it’s kind of its own thing.
I really like the idea of what Oath is going for: a living game that changes and evolves with each play, but not in a permanent fashion, and not with an end. In that sense it’s markedly different from a legacy game (which has both permanent changes and also a set end to those changes). But when trying to find other games like it I find that I don’t have a word to describe it. It seems like right after Risk: Legacy came out everybody agreed on the legacy tag for that kind of game, and then when Pandemic Legacy came out it was irreversible. Now everybody knows what a legacy game is. Oath seems to be doing something just as new as the legacy thing was back then, but no term seems to have come out. Like, there’s no category of “chronicle games”.
I think it’s just a matter of time when the category chronicle game will be officially added into the filters. It kinda misses the purpose to make a category when there is only one game with such mechanism in the market so far.
Because as they stated in the rulebook, the “chronicle” describes the best the element that happens between plays.
There doesn’t even have to be a physical journal to write the changes down - the deck of temporarily stored cards is continually raising, changing the main deck the game is played with every other game to follow.
Hm. As the cards are kinda stored in unaccessible vault, maybe a vault game could be another suitable term.