• @someguy3
    link
    English
    31 month ago

    There are plenty of military cargo planes. They have the C designation. C130 is a popular one.

    • jrs100000
      link
      English
      31 month ago

      Thats tiny baby plane. Need big big plane, but not too big. Just right size and range.

      • @someguy3
        link
        English
        11 month ago

        There are a whole shit ton of models for every need and size.

        • jrs100000
          link
          English
          21 month ago

          Let me know which one is right Ill let the Joint Chiefs know.

          • @someguy3
            link
            English
            2
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            If you are the one claiming it’s the perfect cargo plane, even better than cargo planes, it’s on you to prove it. What even is this conversation, it started you thinking cargo airplanes were civilian and then you just duck and weave on everything in the weirdest way.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              21 month ago

              I think the missing piece here is that B-52 isn’t just a pretty good cargo hauler, it’s a pretty good cargo hauler that we don’t need to buy a whole new airframe to get. Think of it less as “we’re commissioning these B-52s” and more as “hey look we found a way to use all these B-52s we already had” only this just keeps working forever.

              • @someguy3
                link
                English
                11 month ago

                Well they upgraded all the engines at some point. I don’t know the cost breakdown between engines vs frame but I don’t think it’s good.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  11 month ago

                  Gotta be cheaper than buying new planes which would also have new engines. Generally there needs to be a pretty substantial increase in capability before it’s worth retiring an existing platform, especially in a logistics role where you don’t get as much benefit from the bleeding edge because nobody’s supposed to be shooting at you in the first place.

                  • @someguy3
                    link
                    English
                    11 month ago

                    You need new electronics for the new engines, new training for the new handling, etc etc. The cost difference to existing cargo planes that are already in service is becoming less and less. This could easily be a case of being penny wise and pound foolish.

            • jrs100000
              link
              English
              11 month ago

              I never claimed any of that. Perhaps you are thinking of something else?