• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    71 year ago

    I don’t think it’s anything nefarious. More like Labor shooting themselves in the foot by running a shit campaign.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      0
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Very possible unfortunately. Not having an answer for basic questions like how many people are appointed, how they’re appointed, and for how long is pathetic.

      The cynic in me goes straight to that there’s a reason why they’re not divulging these things and it’s because the yes voters wouldn’t like the answers.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        More billshit, that assertion has already been directly disproven earlier in this thread. Why are you so committed to posting misinformation?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          0
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          It was not disproven. If it is then you should be able to answer my questions in the comment you replied to then, right?

          How many people are appointed?

          How are they appointed?

          How long are the terms of appointment?

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              0
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I’m not “attemping to spread” anything. I’m undecided on how I’m going to vote and I’m trying to decide.

              Why do some of you guys just attribute everything you don’t like to malice?

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  1
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  I’m not a “conservative”. Have literally never voted for the LNP. I’ve voted for the greens more than I’ve voted for Labor in my 20+ years of voting.

                  Quit with the bullshit accusations.

                  What you call “answering the questions” is not what I consider an actual answer to the question being asked. The real answer as I know it now is “it’s up to the government post referendum, and can change whenever the government at the time wants”, but those aren’t the “answers” being thrown around.

                  You’re the person that said unless you’ve had a lived experience that makes you want to vote No, you should vote yes. That’s ridiculous. Automatically assuming it’s a good thing is dumb, though I’m not surprised with your “you’re an undercover conservative running a fud campaign” comment.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            21 year ago

            Read the responses others have already posted; you’ll find that your asinine bullshit has already been roundly disproved. You’re constantly posting content you know is false. Why?