• @uservoid1
    link
    English
    1082 months ago

    One can interpret the maps as: Rural children are diagnosed less than children in large cities

    • The Picard ManeuverOP
      link
      332 months ago

      I don’t know, a lot of the red is over pretty rural areas in the south and parts of the southwest, and the majority of the most rural parts of the country are “not significant”.

      Also that big blue part in the middle covers some very large cities.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        52 months ago

        The ‘not significant’ part could be due to low numbers in general, so they can’t get the variances small enough to get low p numbers. It’s a quote that I can’t quite remember perfectly that is well known in sociology/psychology: “The only reason our findings aren’t significant is because we’re too damn lazy to drag enough people in for the study.”

    • @Mango
      link
      182 months ago

      Map can be interpreted as “if you look for something, you’ll find it.”

    • Pennomi
      link
      English
      142 months ago

      Could also be effects of air pollution or something. There’s not enough information to tell.

      But yeah, maps like this are almost always cities doing things differently than rural areas.

      • @Blue_Morpho
        link
        92 months ago

        The middle of nowhere Montana has more pollution than downtown Dallas?

        • Pennomi
          link
          English
          42 months ago

          Well the point was more “unknown environmental effects” rather than air pollution specifically.

        • @kemsat
          link
          English
          12 months ago

          Isn’t the oil industry doing stuff up in Montana?

      • @ChonkyOwlbear
        link
        42 months ago

        Could represent genetic distribution. Autism is heritable.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        12 months ago

        Yeah. Could also be that spending time outside also helps. (The causation might be reversed though).

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      122 months ago

      Absolutely not. There’s some hugely populated places in cold spots here and very rural hot spots. Rural Georgia is all red here. The greater San Francisco bay area is a cold spot. Dallas-Ft. Worth, Minneapolis, Seattle too. Some very rural parts of Mississippi are hot spots here.