Summary

France’s Flamanville 3 nuclear reactor, its most powerful at 1,600 MW, was connected to the grid on December 21 after 17 years of construction plagued by delays and budget overruns.

The European Pressurized Reactor (EPR), designed to boost nuclear energy post-Chernobyl, is 12 years behind schedule and cost €13.2 billion, quadruple initial estimates.

President Macron hailed the launch as a key step for low-carbon energy and energy security.

Nuclear power, which supplies 60% of France’s electricity, is central to Macron’s plan for a “nuclear renaissance.”

  • @rottingleaf
    link
    English
    181 month ago

    Yes, impeding something is ultimately an increase in cost. That’s how it works.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -21 month ago

      The only miscalculation of the cost by -four times- was due to protest of anti nuclear protestors, according to you?

      Source pls?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -3
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          I was reacting to what /u/DaviddoesLemmy and /u/ryedaft were saying.

          You need to take the two parent posts in consideration for my argument.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            21 month ago

            Are you suggesting that delays don’t impact the cost? Or that the impact of those delays doesn’t account for the 4x budget overrun?

            I think it’s only one factor in the budget overrun, but still worth mentioning.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 month ago

              I’m not saying that. But saying that the only cause the project went over budget was over those protests is equally ridiculous, no?

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  21 month ago

                  No that was the confusing aspect. /U/rottingleaf began a counter argument that kind of skewed your point. At first I thought it was you. But it became confrontational soon.

                  I just wanted to put a mild argument in that if it went over budget by that far there must’ve been other reasons.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        6
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        If you are paid $1 an hour and it takes 6 hours that is $6

        If you work 12 hours that is $12

        12>6

        The problem with nuclear is that as a bombing target it has a greater impact than a solar farm. Having said that it was once a goal for every Canadian to have a reactor in their basement