(No, just keep on. These kinds of regulations were long overdue)

    • @Dmian
      link
      46
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      deleted by creator

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        81 year ago

        I do agree on this, the EU doesn’t just blindly fly out with a proposal, they actually do research before they plan on passing anything.

      • @weinermeat
        link
        01 year ago

        If the EU knows what it’s doing, why are they only using phone OSes from US based companies? I’d argue that they don’t know what they are doing at all considering they have made extremely little contribution to the space and yet want to regulate those products. Imagine the kind of trash they would have to use if the US companies pulled out of the EU.

        • @Dmian
          link
          0
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          deleted by creator

          • @weinermeat
            link
            -1
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            And I’m not saying those changes are necessarily negative, I’m saying that the EU is overreaching when they contribute very little at this point. And if you really want to talk about how you “do things differently”, without the US you’d all be using PutinPhones in 2030 and have no environmental regulations at all lol.

            If you’re worried about the environment you should be looking at industrial waste from China, not Apple phones.

            • @Dmian
              link
              1
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              deleted by creator

        • @Dmian
          link
          7
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          deleted by creator

            • @Dmian
              link
              3
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              deleted by creator

              • @bob_wiley
                link
                English
                2
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                deleted by creator

                • @Dmian
                  link
                  0
                  edit-2
                  9 months ago

                  deleted by creator

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                01 year ago

                The other explanation for lightning on the phone is that it’s a better connector for a phone.

                It’s simpler, easier to clean, more durable and is designed to break the cable instead of the phone when twisted or bent.

                • @Dmian
                  link
                  2
                  edit-2
                  9 months ago

                  deleted by creator

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    -11 year ago

                    I don’t know what makes any company make the decisions they do, but it’s easy to see that lightning is a better connector for a phone.

                    You’re right that usbc supports more lanes and by extension a higher transfer speed and that usbc has a higher voltage power delivery standard.

                    The better physical port to have on a phone is lightning. It’s more durable, easier to clean, and the cable breaks instead of the port.

                    The environment phones live in makes those much more important than faster transfers and charging speed (every phone I’ve dealt with from any manufacturer actually throttles back the charging speed to save the battery!).

                    So while usbc has significant advantages over lightning, it’s physically a bad port to have on a device that’s hanging around in your pocket and that makes it worse.

    • @DragonAce
      link
      161 year ago

      “Everything must have USB-C” sounds great right now, but what about when it gets old and slow or something better comes a long that is worth the switch… we have to wait for the EU to tell everyone it’s ok and make a transition plan for the whole industry?

      The entire point of the USB-C thing is so there is a standard charging port across all mobile devices. I doubt this is some sort of attempt at regulating the technology itself. If something faster comes along then it will organically become the new industry standard, just as every other USB charging port up to this point(e.g micro USB, mini USB). Apple is the outlier because they’ve kept their proprietary charging port for years, for the sole purpose of being able to set their own price for cables, dongles, etc… and preventing people from buying cheaper 3rd party options.

    • Dojan
      link
      131 year ago

      I don’t thing legislating them is the right thing to do. Politicians are not technologists, nor do they have any insight into future product roadmaps.

      Without regulations we’d have child labour. Companies only care about profit, and will do their best to get that, and gladly sacrifice customer satisfaction and employee health as far as they believe they can get away with it.

      Without regulations companies and employers would screw over their customers and employees left and right. We know this because that’s the reality we live in today.

      I agree that politicians tend to be both technologically inept and slow as hell to act, but currently that’s the lesser evil.

      I’d also that 3rd party app stores provide less consumer choice. Right now I have the choice of a platform with a walled garden or one with 3rd party app stores. The EU is trying to take away that choice.

      This makes no sense. You can opt out of third party stores on both platforms. Adding a choice will never take something away.

        • Dojan
          link
          11 year ago

          Well, no. The app store will come preinstalled on all phones still, meaning as a developer it’s in your interest to publish on the first-party store if you want as wide an audience as possible. It might be true that some apps will migrate away from the app store because of Apple’s draconian and unresponsive review system, but that’s really on them. I don’t think most people will though.

          It does also open up for things like Microsoft’s Game Stream to get an official non-browser app, since Apple currently prohibits that from launching on the app store due to it not meeting their regulatory standards.

          • @bob_wiley
            link
            English
            2
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            deleted by creator

            • Dojan
              link
              English
              11 year ago

              Feel like that’s a bit comparing apples to oranges. Apps weren’t originally acquired through some store on Macs, that’s a fairly novel thing. There were package managers and such before that but you’d more or less always get software from the vendor. Disregarding that the original iPhones didn’t have apps, as long as apps have been a thing they’ve always come from the app store.

              Sure you can root it and get apps from Cydia and whatnot (if that’s still around) but I really don’t think many apps will migrate away, at least not fully. Users are lazy, and installing a separate app store or getting an app elsewhere is too much work for some. I don’t think you and I fall into that category given the platform we’re having this conversation on, but the fediverse is “too unapproachable” for a lot of people, even tech savvy ones, because you can’t simply download an app and sign up.

              I’m in favour of third party app stores (or just the ability to install apps through the browser, no store attached) simply because I’m miffed my Apple TV cannot run Xbox Game Stream.

              • @bob_wiley
                link
                English
                3
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                deleted by creator

                • Dojan
                  link
                  English
                  11 year ago

                  Yeah the iPhone was definitely out a bit too early with aiming for webapps. Now the tools and APIs are really mature so webapps are more of an option, but back then? Goodness I dread to think.

                  Not being 16, I have different priorities and I like that there is an option in the market that serves those priorities rather well.

                  I feel this, and it’s in large parts why I chose to swap from Android to iOS when I got fed up with manually fixing my OnePlus One back in 2020. I spent 8 hours a day working with tech as it is, I don’t want to spend my free-time tweaking Linux or flashing ROMs to my phone.

                  Time will tell how the third party app stores will turn out, if they turn out at all that is. Apple might still find a way to severely limit them, like restricting API access to apps not installed through the first party app store, or something similar.

    • @coffeebiscuit
      link
      111 year ago

      For profit company’s aren’t “technologists” either. The non removable battery’s aren’t there for the consumers benefits, they are there to take more control over the repair market … and make more profit. Not to be more techy.

      It’s all about market control/money.

    • ZyratoxxOP
      link
      8
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      USB c is what almost everyone except for Apple has kind of agreed on anyways (except for parts the notebook market and some older tech that still uses micro usb for some reason)

      It’s not like in 2004, where Sony Ericsson, Nokia, Motorola and so on each had their own plugs…

      And take a look at the PC market, where USB has been a thing since 1996 (I definitely did not have to google that *cough cough) ofc the plug evolved, but the design stayed the same so that you can plug 27 year old usb peripherals into your new shiny gaming PC. And I’ve had phones with USB c since 2016/17, so that has also been around for quite a while now.

      About the 3rd party apps I can say: you are always free to stay within the “walled garden”. Not just on Apple, but on Android as well.

      If it wasn’t for privacy I wouldn’t need 3rd party stores at all as Google Play features almost every (legal) Android app in existence. 3rd party apps give me the opportunity to choose between a big tech store and a community open source alternative. Having store monopoly increases the risk of dictating “agreements” & levies to app devs who need to submit to get their software to the end user.

      • TimeSquirrel
        link
        fedilink
        21 year ago

        I actually do have devices that old. The connector and communications protocol outlived the drivers. It’ll be recognized as some sort of USB device, but I can never use it without a VM running an ancient guest OS.

        • ZyratoxxOP
          link
          11 year ago

          That was my biggest guess that the hardware would work just fine whilst the software would make problems. Maybe one could get it running after doing a bit of tinkering… First guess would have been to try a Linux generic driver or sth… Maybe, with some tinkering, one would get it to work but even the fact that it is still recognised after all that time is amazing…

          I mean, a PC the size of a night table shrunk to the size of a pocket watch. Just amazing!