• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    281 month ago

    That’s not what it said. If you read through the entire article, you find statistics about how many people can’t get prosthetics at all because they aren’t considered necessary or they can’t afford the co-payment or they have to take out a loan.

    But even if what you said were the focus, that would be equally messed up. The article opens with the story of a man who got his artificial leg replaced for many years and only recently did they try to reject the hardware that he needs, the hardware that his doctor prescribes… What kind of screwy bait and switch shit would that be? Your insurance company should not be deciding how you live.

    • @[email protected]OPM
      link
      fedilink
      101 month ago

      The article also mentions that prosthetic limbs can be repossessed. Talk about a dystopia…

      • macniel
        link
        fedilink
        61 month ago

        Oh you can’t pay for your legs anymore, guess we have to take them away.

        • @BradleyUffner
          link
          English
          11 month ago

          The mob will just break your legs; you still get to keep them.

      • @idiomaddict
        link
        21 month ago

        That’s too reminiscent of king Leopold for the 21st century

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      can’t afford the co-payment

      User fees are cruel barriers to proper healthcare. We see it even in some parts of Canada (healthcare in Canada isn’t uniform, region-to-region, as it was relegated to provinces to define so the cruel conservatives couldn’t unilaterally kill it, and so they just gut their own region’s support to the bare letter of the law and thus implement user fees and premiums).