• @Red_October
    link
    -62 months ago

    I’m sure the alternative will be much better for unions, right guys? After all, demolishing the foundations of the country is fine as long as it teaches that one politician that she could have been better!

    • @IndustryStandard
      link
      9
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Kamala would have compromised with unions if she was the better alternative.

      • @Red_October
        link
        22 months ago

        If you honestly believe Trump is better for Unions, or for just about any normal people, you’re not paying attention.

        • @IndustryStandard
          link
          72 months ago

          Kamala honestly believed not compromising with unions would be better than Trump winning

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          12 months ago

          Why are you under the impression that Trump being bad for unions means that Harris would be good for them? This is a false dichotomy. Too many people think we live in the Marvel Universe where there are clearly defined good guys and bad guys.

          • @Red_October
            link
            -12 months ago

            Because there are only two viable choices with any chance at winning in a general election, one was “not good enough” and one wants to actively disband unions. You’re the one assuming I thought Harris would be “Good” for Unions, but even you can’t seriously think Trump won’t be objectively worse for them.

          • @BadmanDan
            link
            -12 months ago

            How do you know? Biden’s track record tells a different story.