• @pyre
    link
    English
    1120 hours ago

    “the ship analogy doesn’t really hold up … if you consider the ships to be a completely unrelated kind of ships … except here’s how it would still hold up anyway”

    • Farid
      link
      fedilink
      English
      116 hours ago

      Warp speeds were clearly modeled to mimick knots. And I’m sure that the lore reason for them not traveling at Enterprise’s top speed all the time is again fuel efficiency and not because it would “blow up” (although 9.9 might be above its rated top speed, I don’t remember). So it doesn’t hold up with people, where you can just eat more and perform at your best all the time, we have additional emotional constraints that don’t apply to equipment.

      Other than all that… perfect analogy.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        414 hours ago

        There is a lot of equipment that is rated for short bursts of power that would be destructive when sustained.

        Military aircraft for example can often reach high speeds for a short duration. This is not improvised but designed and rated for.

        Most modern CPUs have non sustainable boost speeds that they can reach but not sustain due to thermal limits.

        Electric turbochargers often can only operate in short bursts.

        There are countless more examples.

        • Farid
          link
          fedilink
          English
          114 hours ago

          Sure, but we aren’t talking about bursts speeds. We are talking about sustained cruising speeds. I’ve responded to a similar comment of yours in more detail in another branch.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            211 hours ago

            But that’s literally what the post is about. You cannot perform in burst mode sustainably. If you could that wouldn’t be the top/burst speed anymore.