• @LovableSidekick
    link
    English
    -163 days ago

    Everybody who gets banned from anywhere has to face that their personal definition of what happened does not match somebody else’s. I say this from experience.

    • qaz
      link
      English
      122 hours ago

      It’s good to be skeptical, but this case it’s very real

      • @LovableSidekick
        link
        English
        1
        edit-2
        13 hours ago

        I agree with you, and I don’t know why you’re assuming I’m skeptical of OP. How am I not making it clear that I’m on OP’s side? I think OP and I had similar experiences with blahaj - a mod or mods decided we were being hostile when we both meant to be objective. Same thing seems to be happening with the douchevotes I’m getting here. Climb out of your bunkers, folks, you’re not under attack.

    • Draconic NEO
      link
      fedilink
      62 days ago

      Translation: This person doesn’t believe the OP and is attempting to insinuate that OP is just whining about being banned. This sentiment reeks of appeal to authority bias/fallacy and isn’t constructive in this community.

      Additionally it’s not correct since the moderator of said community has expressed sentiment that advocates, excuses, or otherwise finds acceptable, sexualization of minors, in other words pedophillia. I’m not going to debate this, here’s a snapshot of the post the mod likely panic deleted, it’s disgusting pedophilia apologia.

      • @LovableSidekick
        link
        English
        -12 days ago

        Translation: this person thinks they have psychic power to read my mind. Truth is my comment was meant to commiserate with OP. As I mentioned, I was saying what I said from my own experience. Anyway there’s a thing called “projection” where people read into something what they would mean if they said that, which is probably what we’re both doing.