why, though? the choice of the year ending on the 31st of december is wholly made by man–nothing in nature dictates that choice.
if anything, the original calendar had february mopping up after all the other months (which is why the fewer days as well as the tacking on of the leap day there). we’ve already advanced the end of the year by an arbitrary amount of two months. what’s one more week?
unless, of course, you’re saying that the year in review does not take into account the last week of 2023. in which case, yes, you’re right.
why, though? the choice of the year ending on the 31st of december is wholly made by man–nothing in nature dictates that choice.
if anything, the original calendar had february mopping up after all the other months (which is why the fewer days as well as the tacking on of the leap day there). we’ve already advanced the end of the year by an arbitrary amount of two months. what’s one more week?
unless, of course, you’re saying that the year in review does not take into account the last week of 2023. in which case, yes, you’re right.
That last two sentences of yours? That was the entire point