• @disguy_ovahea
    link
    English
    10
    edit-2
    11 days ago

    Sometimes. Advanced technology paved the way for many empires, the Mongols, the Greeks, the Romans, the British, etc.

    Vietnam’s technology may not have been advanced, but it, coupled with the terrain, was very effective at mitigating some of the technological advantages given to their opponents.

    To your point, most currently practiced martial arts were created out of necessity to defend one’s home. Many martial arts began by using fishing or farming tools as weapons due to accessibility. Sometimes a new technique had to be created to survive, like how Koreans didn’t have horses, so they created Taekwondo as a way to kick a person off of a horse.

    So yes, people fight harder in defense than in attack, but that alone isn’t enough. It’s exactly why Ukraine needs all of the munitions support they can get.

    • @PugJesusOPM
      link
      English
      611 days ago

      Unless the technological disparity is so great that it allows a force to utterly and literally exterminate the opposition, it comes down to motivation. In defense or attack - defense is just generally more motivating to a population.