- cross-posted to:
- politics
- cross-posted to:
- politics
Summary
Donald Trump submitted a Supreme Court filing opposing a TikTok ban, citing his “dealmaking expertise” and promising to resolve national security concerns.
The brief advocates delaying the case to allow Trump to address it politically.
Legal experts criticized the filing for being overly self-promotional and unprecedented, with some mistaking it for satire.
Critics noted its unusual tone and highlighted the involvement of Trump’s potential solicitor general pick, D. John Sauer, in drafting the document.
The case concerns TikTok’s alleged violations of privacy laws and ties to China.
Absolutely nothing?
This is a country that has incredibly authoritarian laws on the books regarding the internet because it doesn’t want it’s people reading “”“”“western propaganda”“”", why would we assume it’s reason for continuing that behaviour isn’t the same as it’s always been: bullshit
deleted by creator
We used to put you people in asylums, modern countries out you people in psych wards.
deleted by creator
What argument can be made against actual schizophrenic ramblings with absolutely no basis in reality? How can one start to address the finer points of an argument made during a psychotic break?
deleted by creator
China does not own Tiktok, as stated previously, with linked proof. The basis of your discriminatory beliefs is false, so the rest of your beliefs are false, and likely racist in origin. Get help.
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Right, but Tiktok isnt a Chinese company.