I looked up specifically examples of this and didn’t find answers, they’re buried in general discussions about why compiling may be better than pre-built. The reasons I found were control of flags and features, and optimizations for specific chips (like Intel AVX or ARM Neon), but to what degree do those apply today?

The only software I can tell benefits greatly from building from source, is ffmpeg since there are many non-free encoders decoders and upscalers that can be bundled, and performance varies a lot between devices due to which of them is supported by the CPU or GPU. For instance, Nvidia hardware encoders typically produce higher quality video for similar file sizes than ones from Intel AMD or Apple. Software encoders like x265 has optimizations for AVX and NEON (SIMD extensions for CPUs).

  • @NeoNachtwaechter
    link
    55 days ago

    FreeBSD.

    I needed to set up a whole new small server for a company I had just joined. (Their old beast with MS Exchange was old and fat and dying, with crashes and manual actions every day etc.) I had an expert do the initial install, and he wanted to compile it all in place, right there on this machine. OK well why not.

    The FreeBSD server turned out to be a quiet workhorse that never complained about anything, and only about 3 or 4 years later we had the first occasion when a reboot was needed.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      1
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      Yeah, FreeBSD OS absolutely awesome
      Have nothing more to add…

      Well, maybe: I wanted to setup my work server with FreeBSD and I really had trouble getting Linux VMs up and running
      Still don’t know, what I did wrong, but I went the other way round and setup a Linux server, with a FreeBSD VM as “Gate-keeper” (my Wireguard every point), and so it secures my other stuff behind

      But I really liked how nice it is to work with. Sadly I was too stupid to set it up right, with multiple services/containers/VMs I needed …