• @grue
    link
    English
    -65 days ago

    How is it any different than claiming with near certainty that leprechauns aren’t real?

    Does Richard fucking Dawkins claim to be “near certain?”

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      85 days ago

      ?

      Sorry, not following you, I couldn’t actually care less what Richard fucking Dawkins thinks tbh.

      • @grue
        link
        English
        3
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        My comment was in the context of replying to https://lemmy.world/comment/14237089:

        Richard Dawkins is his own religion.


        Edit: also, funnily enough, it turns out that Dawkins does claim to be “near certain,” not “certain.” That was news to me, given his reputation!

        That’s relevant because it puts a finer point on just how fervent the belief needs to be to count as “strong atheism.”

        Source:

        In The God Delusion, Dawkins describes people for whom the probability of the existence of God is between “very high” and “very low” as “agnostic” and reserves the term “strong atheist” for those who claim to know there is no God. He categorizes himself as a “de facto atheist” but not a “strong atheist” on this scale.

          • @Cocodapuf
            link
            44 days ago

            Hey, only for continuing to engage with an off the rails discussion. But your arguments are articulate and on point.

          • @grue
            link
            English
            15 days ago

            That’s okay; it happens to all of us (see my edit).