• @feedum_sneedson
    link
    45 days ago

    This conflates material reality and ideology, though. Not to say a cultural or social reality isn’t real in its own way, just that it is preceded by objective, material reality. I think the arguments tend to boil down to people prioritising one or the other and then refusing to budge.

    I’m pretty laid back about it but draw the line at people attempting to assert there is no such thing as material conditions. I’m not explicitly “Marxist” but definitely Marxian in the sense that I think all theories need to be anchored in material reality in the first instance. So gender categories exist, but are part of the superstructure.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      25 days ago

      The moment humans had enough brain power to form and ideologies, they stated influencing material reality. Ideology as a concept therefore also precedes part of material reality.

      In other words: The idea of gender expression has influenced human selection, therefore it’s part of our current gene pool, just like sexuality. (Because gender is what sexual attraction can have preference for, not karyotype)

      • @feedum_sneedson
        link
        15 days ago

        That’s why we say the base precedes the superstructure “in the first instance”.