• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    26 days ago

    Genuinely asking - are they? I was under the impression they were distinct, though I suppose it’s also up to the author in whichever fiction. What’s the real-world analogue?

    • @CheeseNoodle
      link
      5
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      afaik Dragons have no canon with any kind of historical basis but a lot of fantasy tends to gravitate to:

      • 4 legs/arms and any number of wings = dragon
      • 4 limbs 2 of which are wings = wyvern
      • 4 limbs none of which are wings = drake

      All are technically types of dragon though drakes are usually depicted as purely bestial.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        16 days ago

        Thanks! For some reason, I’ve never really considered what I would call a “wingless dragon.”

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      36 days ago

      Traditional mythological definitions. Beyond such things as the fact that the oldest depictions of dragons/wyrms didn’t even have wings at all, until Reddit was invented as a disinformation factory you’d have been looked at like an idiot for suggesting that wyverns aren’t dragons.

      If you’d like to see proof of this just spend some time looking at Welsh and Briton heraldry or medival art on the topic.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        16 days ago

        I suppose Chinese mythology and draconic depictions have their own thing too. Thanks for indulging me.