• LughOPM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -4
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    I admit I’m torn here. On the one hand I think the future is to have AI ubiquitous and integrated into everything. On the other hand, fake AI ‘friends’ on a friend’s network sounds hideous.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      375 days ago

      What are you torn about?

      Hammers are good tools, but throwing them at people without warning is unequivocally bad, nothing to be torn about.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      55 days ago

      Oh, but it also means that with the help of a few bots, you can appear to have friends, while still being your normal introverted self. People who expect you to be a social butterfly, can continue to live under that illusion, and you don’t actually have to make any new friends in real life. I see that as a win-win for everyone.

      • jrs100000
        link
        English
        45 days ago

        Absolutely. And if your new friends just happen to be really into an ever shifting set name brand products and niche political opinions…honestly, yea, that is probably better than watching people you used to respect get sucked into yet another get rich quick scheme.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          25 days ago

          I have a feeling that Meta will try to make your new bot buddies harmless and inoffensive - two qualities that rarely coexist in meatbags.

          • jrs100000
            link
            English
            35 days ago

            I think they know their audience better than they do. It will take some tuning to work out the bugs, but eventually the AIs will be exactly what each individual expects their friends to be.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              25 days ago

              They will probably aim for that, but actually doing so will produce hilarious results. Imagine what would happen to someone who is into BDSM or some other spicy topic. Then meta would generate them a bunch of BDSM buddies that post all sorts of wild stuff all the time.

              My argument is that as Meta matures, it becomes increasingly risk averse, just like large companies tend to. They might still try what you suggested, but after a few PR disasters they’ll tone it down a bit. Maybe after a few iterations, the bots will produce hilarious results as rarely as possible while still being just barely interesting. In other words: harmless and inoffensive.

              • jrs100000
                link
                English
                25 days ago

                I think they might just let the disasters happen. The end picture looks less like a social network and more like billions of individual humans floating in their own personal fantasy worlds populated almost entirely with AI friends.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  12 days ago

                  Status update: it took only a few minutes for the backlash to happen.

                  As users began to sniff out some of Meta’s AI accounts this week, the backlash grew, in part because of the way the AI accounts disingenuously described themselves as actual people with racial and sexual identities.

                  source: https://edition.cnn.com/2025/01/03/business/meta-ai-accounts-instagram-facebook/index.html

                  Oh, now they have bots that are into all sorts of spicy stuff. Pretty much what I expected.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  15 days ago

                  The current LLMs hallucinations and horror themed pictures have been pretty entertaining already. Sounds like there could be good times ahead if Meta lets the AIs run wild. 🍿