“But tires”

Ban all vehicles over 5000lbs to start without a specialized license and extremely heavy fees to have them. EVs are dropping in weight daily, ICE vehicles have been increasing in weight to dodge policies. One is a means to an end, the other is a means to profit.

Profit for few vs humanity’s existance… which should we choose?

  • KillingTimeItself
    link
    fedilink
    English
    18
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    im gonna hazard a really basic proposition.

    The volume of the earths atmosphere is perhaps, just a little bit bigger than the volume of approximately 1 billion garages.

    If you’re going to shitpost about science, at least be accurate about it. Nobody thinks they “aren’t bad” that’s literally a fallacious argument to even propose. Sure, toxic chemicals are bad for you, but there are FDA defined limits for how much of them is considered to be safe on an annual basis.

    also, “banning” larger heavier vehicles is based.

    • @LifeInMultipleChoiceOP
      link
      3
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      So how much carbon monoxide turning into CO2 and building up in the atmosphere and causing the earths temperature to slowly rise and threaten the ecosystems of the majority of earth does the FDA define as okay?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        64 days ago

        Cars don’t typically produce carbon monoxide. It’s special circumstances caused by the garage that caused the carbon monoxide

        • KillingTimeItself
          link
          fedilink
          English
          34 days ago

          this is definitely a good point.

          restricted or incomplete combustion has really negative side effects. Notably, more pollution.

        • @LifeInMultipleChoiceOP
          link
          2
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          Isn’t the main purpose of the catalytic converter to minimize the CO (and other chemicals) being exhausted? Those illegal to take off vehicles things on every car…

          It is supposed to be CO2 and water though that comes out of it… but it doesn’t work out so clean as the air going in isn’t just oxygen

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            5
            edit-2
            4 days ago

            That is what they’re supposed to do.
            But you’re talking about an operating environment way outside of what they were designed for.

            ICE cars suck.
            But cars aren’t driving around the road and spewing out CO in such concentration that’d they’d give someone CO poisoning.

            Pick a different example about why ICE cars clearly suck.

            • @LifeInMultipleChoiceOP
              link
              1
              edit-2
              4 days ago

              The CO becomes CO2 in the atmosphere as well eventually. I understand what you mean, which is why I was going to originally delete the post, but some people said leave it, so I did. Really it is just saying if exhaust is so obviously known to be bad in one situation, why is it so hard to understand that it can be bad in other ways. (Trapping in heat really)

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                24 days ago

                I kinda get what you mean, in that sense. “It’s bad here so why can’t you believe it’s bad there?”

                But the dangers they pose are so different in nature that it’s inviting criticism; lots of things are dangerous in specific circumstances but fine normally.

                Anyways, you’re taking the criticism better than I’m able to lol

                • @LifeInMultipleChoiceOP
                  link
                  24 days ago

                  It was a drunken post on New Year’s Eve… If I know anything in life it’s that alcohol does not make sound choices lol. I suppose I’m just glad I didn’t text an ex. Motivation not to drink as much haha

      • KillingTimeItself
        link
        fedilink
        English
        14 days ago

        im gonna hazard a little guess, and say they don’t define this, because this would be like the FDA having recommended estimates for how many hurricanes you can consume within approximately a year, as that would be a rather silly statistic. They probably don’t do that one.

        Little known fun fact, the FDA is actually short hand for “food and drug administration” if you’re concerned about like, global warming you should ask someone else like NASA. Which handles things related to the atmosphere. There would also be NOAA, which more directly handles the atmosphere, that’s kind of it’s job, you should probably ask them.

        • @LifeInMultipleChoiceOP
          link
          2
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          The FDA requires me to eat 4 hurricanes a year, with a side of has browns, haha

          (I think it’s the CDC that does regulations on carbon monoxide though)

          • KillingTimeItself
            link
            fedilink
            English
            14 days ago

            im guessing OSHA probably has a few also. Most definitely some health agency, though i wouldn’t be surprised if the FDA did have something pertaining to carbon monoxide, more generically. They have a lot of weird ones.

    • Jolteon
      link
      fedilink
      24 days ago

      A very, very rough estimate is that the atmosphere is 6,000,000,000,000,000 times larger than a typical garage (or over 6 orders of magnitude more than OP’s claim), based on a typical one-car garage being 100 cubic meters and The atmosphere being 6e9 cubic kilometers.