Summary

Chinese President Xi Jinping reiterated in his New Year’s speech that Taiwan’s “reunification” with China is inevitable.

China has escalated military activity around Taiwan, including frequent incursions near the island and sanctions on U.S.-linked companies over arms sales to Taipei.

Taiwanese President Lai Ching-te rejected Beijing’s claims, stating Taiwan’s future can only be decided by its people.

Lai also criticized China’s restrictions on travel and education exchanges with Taiwan, calling for dignified, reciprocal relations based on goodwill and equality.

    • comfy
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -53
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Why isn’t that an appropriate term? It was part of China’s (Qing) territory from 1684 until the Japanese occupations, and is only disunified because of an unresolved civil war. Taiwan (officially the “Republic of China”) considers themself to be China. So why wouldn’t their combination be the reunification of China?

      • @kshade
        link
        English
        354 days ago

        Taiwan was never part of current China though and does not want to be absorbed into that state. Reunification doesn’t sound right for what China would have to do to make it happen.

        • comfy
          link
          fedilink
          English
          23 days ago

          Reunification doesn’t sound right

          It’s an objective term for when states join into a single state, like the unification of Italy for example. It’s not about approval or disapproval, I’m not taking a side by calling it reunification.

          • @kshade
            link
            English
            3
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            The re- prefix does have implications that go beyond any two states becoming one. Germany’s case is a bit different anyway because it was external forces splitting the country.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          24 days ago

          Taiwan was never part of current China though

          The same was true for East and West Germany and that, err, merger is generally considered to be a reunification.

          But I agree with the rest you wrote, so I guess it’s a moot point anway.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              23 days ago

              I mean, true, but that doesn’t contradict what I wrote, does it? I objected to that particular part of kshades argument, not their argument as a whole.

              • @kshade
                link
                English
                1
                edit-2
                3 days ago

                It’s a fair argument, I wouldn’t call South or North Korea forcefully annexing the other reunification either though. One state would be annihilated, both in terms of its institutions and its culture. There’s no unity in that, it’s conquest.

                But maybe my view of the word is colored by German history. I don’t know, it’s just that calling what would be a horrible, grueling war “reunification” doesn’t seem right, like an attempt at white-washing what would actually happen. Reminds me a bit too much of Putin’s claims about Ukraine.

      • @Rhoeri
        link
        English
        124 days ago

        If you want something that doesn’t want you- what do YOU call it?

        • comfy
          link
          fedilink
          English
          43 days ago

          What’s that got to do with anything? It’s still called a reunification even if both sides didn’t want it. There was a whole entity, it split, and if it joins back together then that’s called reunifying it.

      • @GrammarPolice
        link
        English
        174 days ago

        Get your authoritarian ass outta here😂

        • comfy
          link
          fedilink
          English
          3
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          Not an authoritarian, not even taking a side. I’m pointing out that unification is the term for resolving partitions to form a single state.

          • @mohammed_alibi
            link
            English
            1
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            So its no longer an authoritarian government for 38 years now. Thanks for pointing that out!

            In the mean time Xi is serving his 3rd term in PRC right now, or 4th? Ignoring the rules set up by his predecessors. And you think that’s better?

              • @mohammed_alibi
                link
                English
                22 days ago

                Because China holds a veto power. What’s your point? China won’t allow Taiwan to join a club that China’s partially in control of. In other news, water is wet.

                • @TokenBoomer
                  link
                  English
                  -11 day ago

                  Interesting, the ROC doesn’t hold veto power? How can China join the club, if Taiwan is the rightful government representing all the Chinese people?

        • comfy
          link
          fedilink
          English
          33 days ago

          You can use both terms, there’s no contradiction.

          Consider the US civil war. The Confederates were (rightfully) invaded and plenty of them still aren’t happy about it, the result was still the unification of the ‘northern’ and the ‘southern’ states.

      • AlexisFR
        link
        fedilink
        English
        04 days ago

        Got it, let’s help continental China adopt modern and true democracy then!

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          22 days ago

          Work on your own imperialist fucking country first. Jesus fucking Christ you libs are insufferable.

      • Amon
        link
        English
        -14 days ago

        Bro please move to .ml there are dozens of you there