• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    184 days ago

    academically no one disputes

    I’ll just stop you right there. The probability of there not being an academic dispute about anything is miniscule. There are broad agreements on some topics, but counterpoints will still be easy to find.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      23 days ago

      My understanding from the Data over Dogma podcast (wherein a biblical scholar, and an atheist come together to trash evangelical apologia and other misconceptions about early Christianity and what the Bible contains/lacks) is that there is a single quasi-relevant academic that contends Christianity likely did not form around a historical person with a name similar to Jesus.

      His arguments have been examined by academics but not widely accepted. His arguments aren’t widely accepted because it seems a lot more likely that there was a guy named Jesus who whose teachings inspired a group of followers, than that a group of proto- Christians invented him.

      • @Dkarma
        link
        English
        23 days ago

        Whoa if it was in an obscure podcast it must be accurate.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -74 days ago

          It’s very clear that I mean within academia it is accepted that Jesus existed. Blocked. Stop starting fights over nothing.