I don’t think that allocation is objectively correct, or that there even exists a “right” way to engage. Different folks have different values, strengths, and interests, and I think the most important thing is that we’re all pulling in the same direction of “get everyone’s basic needs met.”
There’s a pretty clear right way to engage. Show empathy, tell the truth, supply evidence.
It’s fine to have unique political ideologies and aspirations, but anybody who preaches dissolution of the state is not a person on your side for supporting an established political party or passing reforms.
Their idea of “fixing the problem” is not a realistic or reasonable way to fix the problem. They can’t help us, they can’t help anybody.
Lmao no
There’s a pretty clear right way to engage. Show empathy, tell the truth, supply evidence.
Wait what’s the problem with anark?
It’s fine to have unique political ideologies and aspirations, but anybody who preaches dissolution of the state is not a person on your side for supporting an established political party or passing reforms.
Their idea of “fixing the problem” is not a realistic or reasonable way to fix the problem. They can’t help us, they can’t help anybody.