I feel like not enough people appreciate the simple fact that Wikipedia is essentially the most well-organized and complete collection of human knowledge in existence, and furthermore, it’s available to everyone who has access to the internet for free in dozens of languages.

There are tens of thousands of individuals collaborating every hour of every day to collect knowledge and share it with the rest of the world purely out of the desire to document and teach, and millions of people spending hours in the Wikipedia rabbit hole learning about subjects that they would have had no opportunity to without it.

Wikipedia is amazing. It’s the modern Library of Alexandria.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    57
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    As an ex-contributor, what goes on behind the scenes is absolutely wild. If you’re ever bored and want something to take over your life… Start editing Wikipedia.

        • @Drewsteau
          link
          171 year ago

          As I generally read the science related pages, I have yet to find a bad citation, they are almost always from an accredited journal or other verified source. The Wikipedia chemistry section has saved me so much time and given me so much helpful info. The pages on genes and proteins are also usually amazing!

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        91 year ago

        It depends, the reliable sources guidelines do get followed to a tee for controversial/edit warred articles

    • PugJesus
      link
      fedilink
      161 year ago

      Me when I check some minor article and I notice some questionable things, go into the talk page, and observe the fireworks behind the scenes