Just because something makes sense doesn’t make it true. That is why I included the source which argues the point. Also, I am saying it might not be true.

Am not saying you are wrong or right, just that the commonly accepted theory makes a lot of sense.

Also it isn’t really reasonable to vaguely state something which is contrary to common knowledge and “cite”/recommend an entire 700 page book. Imo, you should at least make concrete statements which are possible to dispute and optimally include page numbers like Wikipedia most often does. But I understand that that is out of scope of a simple comment

Also I find it a bit weird when you want a government but without politicians. Doesn’t a government pretty much per definition need politicians or should the government be run like a company with a bunch of bosses or something?

But yeah it would absolutely be interesting to research how people did governments and everything else in the past. Historians