We’re going broad with this one given the population and the size.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        11
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        I’m gonna need a link for that cause that makes no sense at all in the context of all other finds.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          -94 days ago

          Nice down vote, you can go find it yourself now (or remain ignorant, I don’t really care if you learn anything new or not).

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          -24 days ago

          AFAIK, the “out-of-africa” hypothesis isn’t so much based on skeleton findings.

          It’s more based on some thoughts. One of them is that africa has a “high genetic variability” which they see as proof that humanity originated there, even though i doubt the soundness of that argument.

          The second reason is some kind of racism: “if africans are really inferior beings, that must be because life originated there and emigrated and africans simply stayed behind in both space and development.” (not my thoughts)

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            6
            edit-2
            4 days ago

            Ironically in the 19th centuries Europeans were all clamouring to have definitive proof that Homo Sapiens evolved within their borders to prove that they were the greatest and most fully evolved humans.

            Out of Africa had to work pretty hard to become accepted.

            And is very much based on skeletal records.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        14 days ago

        Do you mind providing a source ? I’ve been reading fascinating fiction on the subject of early humans (by Jean M Auel) and I’d love to know more

      • @NineMileTower
        link
        14 days ago

        What is this record of humans that you speak of?