Will we know why had universe began, why there is something instead of nothing.

  • @kava
    link
    62 days ago

    The difference between “how” and “why” doesn’t seem very meaningful to me. For example- why does water boil? It boils because molecules gain enough energy through heat to transition states.

    In that same sense, OP’s question

    why there is something instead of nothing.?

    There’s a non zero chance that we eventually understand the mechanisms behind the big bang and can explain how nothing turned into something. Therefore we will be able to explain the why, no?

    • Cid Vicious
      link
      fedilink
      English
      42 days ago

      The problem with the question of why is that you can always ask why again. Say we do understand the mechanism of the big bang. You can still ask “why” about why things are that way. Which is why in my view that’s still more of a “how?” “Why” is more of a question for philosophers than scientists imo.

      • @kava
        link
        12 days ago

        But is that not the same way with “how”?

        How do objects fall to the ground? → the Earth exerts a gravitational force on them

        How does Earth exert a gravitational force? → All objects with mass create a gravitational field that attracts other masses

        How do objects create a gravitation field? → Mass warps spacetime and this curvature directs objects to follow paths towards the source of the mass

        and so on, etc

        • @tronx4002
          link
          21 day ago

          I think the “why” exists only with the idea that the universe is directed in some way. e.g. “How can I see around my room”? Photons. “Why”? Because I turned on the light.