Summary

China has intensified its crackdown on erotic fiction writers, particularly those creating danmei (gay romance/erotica), with over 50 arrests in Anhui province since June 2024.

At least 10 individuals have been sentenced, with penalties reaching up to 4.5 years in prison. Many writers published on Taiwan-based Haitang Literature, which has faced disruption.

Under China’s strict laws, earning over 250,000 yuan (~$34,500) from such works can result in a life sentence, though reduced sentences are possible if profits are repaid.

Critics argue the campaign undermines freedom of expression and inflates sales figures to justify harsh punishments.

  • Communist
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -1
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Term limits being removed doesn’t mean they don’t hold elections every 5 years… The US didn’t even start out with term limits.

    • Flying SquidM
      link
      English
      52 days ago

      They hold elections regularly in Russia too. Who do you think always gets re-elected every time?

      Also, who runs against you in a one-party state? Who would even dare run against Xi?

      • Communist
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -1
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        They hold elections regularly in Russia too. Who do you think always gets re-elected every time?

        These elections are known to be rigged and you can easily find evidence that they are. I’m asking for evidence like this about China. You seem very confident about this, so, you must have some easily sourced evidence, no?

        who runs against you in a one-party state?

        ??? everyone, because that’s how having one party works, everyone is part of the same party. One party doesn’t mean one candidate. It’s no different than if parties were abolished.

        Who would even dare run against Xi?

        Why would someone bother running against an extremely popular incumbent?

        • Flying SquidM
          link
          English
          32 days ago

          Why would someone bother running against an extremely popular incumbent?

          Oh, so you mean he’s president for life.

          • Communist
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -1
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            Oh, so you mean he’s president for life.

            Yeah, in the same way that Franklin D. Roosevelt was, because of his popularity.

            I support term limits but this ain’t the argument you think it is.

            • Flying SquidM
              link
              English
              22 days ago

              Are you under the bizarre impression that no one ran against FDR? Because otherwise, that’s a completely different situation than the “why would anyone bother” one you just presented.

                • Flying SquidM
                  link
                  English
                  12 days ago

                  There is no law saying that any party must run candidates or that there must only be two parties.

                  Is it that you are intentionally obfuscating or are you really that ignorant about how things work in the American political system?

                  • Communist
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    -1
                    edit-2
                    2 days ago

                    There is no law saying that any party must run candidates or that there must only be two parties.

                    I never said any such law exists. I don’t know what point you’re making… another candidate in the running that had no chance to win? Should I care that vermin supreme was also running?

                    What you really need to demonstrate is that the elections in china are rigged/unfair, that’s the only way to really move forward in this conversation.

                    In order to do that you need one of two pieces of information:

                    1. How delegates are chosen in china
                    2. Proof that ballots are being stuffed/some form of fraud.