@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 2 months agoBut "socialism" is a scary wordslrpnk.netimagemessage-square278fedilinkarrow-up11.52Karrow-down148cross-posted to: [email protected]memes
arrow-up11.47Karrow-down1imageBut "socialism" is a scary wordslrpnk.net@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 2 months agomessage-square278fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]memes
minus-squareNSRXNlinkfedilink0•2 months agoso there is no one “at the top” “exploiting people at the bottom”
minus-squareCowbee [he/they]linkfedilink3•2 months agoYes, technically there is a top and a bottom, like an upper level administrator and a lower level worker, but this is not a relationship of exploitation just like it isn’t your manager that exploits you under Capitalism, but the Business Owner(s).
minus-squareCowbee [he/they]linkfedilink3•2 months agoCorrect. I am a Communist, I am just offering technical clarification that hierarchy exists under Communism, but not exploitation.
so there is no one “at the top” “exploiting people at the bottom”
Yes, technically there is a top and a bottom, like an upper level administrator and a lower level worker, but this is not a relationship of exploitation just like it isn’t your manager that exploits you under Capitalism, but the Business Owner(s).
under communism, there is no exploitation
Correct. I am a Communist, I am just offering technical clarification that hierarchy exists under Communism, but not exploitation.