• @Maggoty
    link
    014 hours ago

    Did… Did you read the whole link? Or just the snip the part that sounds like it supports your argument?

    And yes, if you can’t do better than the wiki then you didn’t get a college education on a topic. It’s an encyclopedia, not a 4 year degree with several thousand hours of learning. And that’s when it’s working well. This article has been cut to shit by ideologues trying to revise history for their own benefit.

    You thought you were going to show up here 3 weeks later and leave some kind of last word discrediting my education when I’m the one pulling the .edu links for you to look at. The fucking irony.

    • @undergroundoverground
      link
      0
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      As you clearly read none of it, I only had to read the first part, as that disproved your nonsense straight away which can be seen by your own words and your own link.

      I don’t need to do better than wiki. You haven’t disproven them. You just declared them to be shit, thinking your arrogance alone can refute what it says. You university should’ve taught you to actually quote specific parts of articles and not just link their entirety, declaring them to agree with you despite it disproving you within the first couple of sentences.

      The edu link disproved you, instantly. So, that’s literally exactly what happened. Its not my fault you made a clown out of yourself by proving yourself wrong. I wish you hadn’t done it too. Its taken the sport out of it.

      • @Maggoty
        link
        16 hours ago

        Buddy. I did read it. Go back. Read it. Internalize it.