Perhaps the most interesting part of the article:

  • vortic
    link
    524 hours ago

    I see this sentiment frequently. What I don’t see, though, is how this can cmbe achieved short of government owned uniform housing. Maybe I’m missing something, though. Can you helpe understand?

    With regard to Japan, you’re right, single family homes aren’t intended to last all that long. This is largely because building standards there change so rapidly thst building something that lasts means that you wasted money. Even if it is built to last, it will fall out of code in a way that it will devalue over time.

    That doesn’t happen in the US because we don’t have the same frequency of disasters and the same rate of change in building codes. Maybe that will change moving forward, though, given the increased frequency of disasters in the US due to climate change.

        • @MintyFresh
          link
          11 hour ago

          As opposed to the suburban sprawl we have now? Every lawn fertilized, every driveway 2.5 cars? Or the shanty towns?

          It turns out building housing is as easy as building housing. I would absolutely live in one of these if they were correctly managed. A half a billion Chinese people can’t be all that wrong.

      • vortic
        link
        223 hours ago

        So, projects? I would love to see a solution to home prices and the inequality they create but I think projects have been shown to work out poorly in the US.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          617 hours ago

          They only work out poorly in some plsces due to neglect. You have to give social services to the residents.