As an example, I love the Martian, and I think a lot of older books from authors like Asimov are heavily into engineering / competence porn. Other favs in this category include the standalone novel Rendezvous with Rama to leave you wishing for more, most of the Culture series for happy utopian vibes, Schlock Mercenary for humor, Dahak series for fun mindless popcorn.

Edit: I’m so happy to have found a replacement for r/books and the rest of them.

  • AFK BRB Chocolate
    link
    English
    13
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    If you end up searching online for that kind of things, “hard science fiction” is the phrase that’s usually used for it.

    A lot of good recommendations here. Some endorsements and other recommendations:

    • Project Hail Mary by Weir is a no brainer choice if you liked The Marian. He gets the science right.
    • Children of Time, by Adrian Tchaikovsky is amazing, and the first of a trilogy, so more to read.
    • The whole Expanse series, by James Corey is good and he does a good job with the science, especially the celestial mechanics.
    • The Uplift series (starting with Sundiver) by David Brin is great, and Brin is will known for hard SF. It’s from the 80s.
    • Ancillary Justice, by Ann Leckie, is great and the first of a series as well.
    • Beggars in Spain, by Nancy Kress, is great, with a good science background, though it’s more genetics than engineering. Really cool story though.
    • I also agree with the recommendation on Saturn’s Children, by Charles Stross. Also the first of a loose series.

    On the flip side, I really didn’t care for Three Body Problem, and though the Bobiverse books seem fun, I’m not sure I’d call them firmly hard SF.

    • Subverb
      link
      91 month ago

      The Three Body Problem is bad. The hype for the book is a good example of “The Emporer’s New Clothes”.

      • @RememberTheApollo_
        link
        31 month ago

        It’s a little bit of a slog. There are a lot of cultural references, plot devices, characters, and ways of moving through the story that are literally foreign to the western mind. Odd injections of what feels like philosophy. At least the version I read. Once you get used to it it gets better.

      • AFK BRB Chocolate
        link
        English
        21 month ago

        I was surprised at how little I liked it given the hype.

        • Subverb
          link
          61 month ago

          I did enjoy the parts about the Cultural Revolution and some of the dialog from Da Shi. That’s about it.

      • @damnthefilibuster
        link
        11 month ago

        I have finished the series and absolutely loved it.

        Could you please explain why you consider it bad?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          31 month ago

          I found the third book very weak, albiet with some interesting ideas.

          Also, made it clear that he can’t write women at all.

          I found them overall fine to good, except the main character’s chapters in the final 2/3rd of Book 3 which were just kinda bleh by the end.

          Book 1 was strong idea explored well.

          Book 2 felt good at the time, but I think feels weaker in hindsight but was some more interesting ideas.

          • @damnthefilibuster
            link
            216 days ago

            Most western sci-fi authors are shit at writing women. So I didn’t hold it against him. But sure, I can see how some people didn’t take to it.

            To me, it was a beautiful series with loads of interesting and horrible twists and turns. The ending is sublime, to me.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              216 days ago

              Most sci-fi authors who can’t write women don’t make them the symbolism laden protagonist of their trilogy’s conclusion.

              Not sure if I should give him points for effort there or not.

              Despite my complaints, I do think it worth a read.

        • AwesomeLowlanderOP
          link
          fedilink
          2
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          I loved it for the game theory, ideas, and what-if aspects. The characters however, were flat 2D cutouts. I can’t say how much of that was due to translation issues, if any.

          • @damnthefilibuster
            link
            116 days ago

            I dunno. Most sci-fi I read from western authors is horrible with their characters. Maybe because I’m mostly reading older sci-fi? Either ways, I didn’t hold that against him or the story.

    • @TheWilliamist
      link
      English
      41 month ago

      Thanks! There a few that I hadn’t heard about!

      • AFK BRB Chocolate
        link
        English
        41 month ago

        Oh, certainly. In case it’s helpful, here’s a post I made last spring with notes from a year of reading - it’s pretty much all SF and fantasy. Many of the books mentioned in this thread are there. I’ve been reading about the same amount since, and will probably do another post on the anniversary of that one.

      • AFK BRB Chocolate
        link
        English
        31 month ago

        I’d love to hear what you think, I enjoyed both quite a lot.