To improve road safety, Lucknow's administration has ordered petrol stations to deny fuel to two-wheeler riders and passengers without helmets from January 26.
Im curious about your argument because this would justify not putting any rules at any time. No cigarettes for under age in shops (might attack a shop keeper), no alcohol in pubs (might attack a bartender), no fines for speeding (might attack cameras or police), no parking restrictions (might attack ticket wardens), etc.
Maybe the threat of fines are not enough to change this behaviour (which I can understand in India after spending a lot of time there) so they are trying a novel approach. One thing Indian police will take more seriously is attacking a worker for applying the rules compared to risking your own life.
I am overall in favour of the new rules being applied. I think the change is good, and this manner of enforcing it should save a lot of lives.
Despite being in favour I still wanted to raise that potential consequence - that some blameless worker is pretty certainly going to get assaulted over this by some angry idiot.
Oh Ok. Sorry, it just can’t across really negative rather than pointing out a potential flaw. I can see difficulties enforcing it by the workers like you mention
Im curious about your argument because this would justify not putting any rules at any time. No cigarettes for under age in shops (might attack a shop keeper), no alcohol in pubs (might attack a bartender), no fines for speeding (might attack cameras or police), no parking restrictions (might attack ticket wardens), etc.
Maybe the threat of fines are not enough to change this behaviour (which I can understand in India after spending a lot of time there) so they are trying a novel approach. One thing Indian police will take more seriously is attacking a worker for applying the rules compared to risking your own life.
I am overall in favour of the new rules being applied. I think the change is good, and this manner of enforcing it should save a lot of lives.
Despite being in favour I still wanted to raise that potential consequence - that some blameless worker is pretty certainly going to get assaulted over this by some angry idiot.
Oh Ok. Sorry, it just can’t across really negative rather than pointing out a potential flaw. I can see difficulties enforcing it by the workers like you mention