• @Madison420
    link
    020 hours ago

    It’s written specifically in reference but with just enough obscurity to say it could be anyone, anyone with a brain knows it’s not. To answer your question I wouldn’t change it at all, it’s fine. The only one playing this dumb game is you and your alts.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      219 hours ago

      How do you imagine language to work if you don’t have a way of communicating what you want to communicate? Both the general and specific statement are reasonable for someone to make in this context, so there should be a way to express both.

      • @Madison420
        link
        -119 hours ago

        Then you agree with me and you’ve been arguing for no goddamn reason dipshit.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          219 hours ago

          I agree that you can reasonably make this specific statement about the US. I don’t agree that this is what OP said, because the general statement is also valid, and they used the words to convey that it’s a general statement.

          • @Madison420
            link
            -119 hours ago

            They did that so x wouldn’t block it not because it’s easier or more factual.

              • @Madison420
                link
                -117 hours ago

                It could be Facebook for all it matter. The reason is the same regardless of media platform but keep on with the weird attempts at gotcha tedium.