Answer the question instead of asking a slightly condescending rhetorical question.
Got a second question too. Do you really think that letting Trump win creates a bigger chance of changing the “first past the post” system you seem to like so much?
I did not “push the political opinion harder towards genocide”. It seems to me just an insane response that you would even ask that. No point in engaging with people who want to derail a conversation.
Apparently you can’t call losers of an election “losers”. Glad i don’t live there at least. Hope you enjoy Trump, truly well deseved.
As for the genocide. Do you think pushing the political opinion harder towards genocide is a good idea?
I’m sorry, is this a serious response?
Answer the question instead of asking a slightly condescending rhetorical question.
Got a second question too. Do you really think that letting Trump win creates a bigger chance of changing the “first past the post” system you seem to like so much?
I did not “push the political opinion harder towards genocide”. It seems to me just an insane response that you would even ask that. No point in engaging with people who want to derail a conversation.
Really? So you didn’t vote for a third party that would inevitably lead to Trump getting elected?
Can you make that question any more loaded?
It is, because it is. I cant frame it in any way that makes you look good.
Yes, because you’re not thinking impartially in the first place.
Do, please, argue the point. Instead of deflecting.