The Duff CEO with a Windows-Logo on his forehead: “Gamers use Windows because of its’ user experience not our de facto monopoly.”

Next Image: Duff CEO with Windows-Logo in front of a “Out of Business” sign. Subtitle: “30 minutes after SteamOS is released”

Edit: Yo, I’m not saying this is gonna happen. I just want to say that Windew’s UX sucks ass.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 hour ago

      We don’t need spy backdoors in Linux, keep that shit in Windows.

      Adoption does not include bad things.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      34 hours ago

      Well if they are losing out on sales due to practices that are incompatible with Linux then companies are less likely to use those practices in the future.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -1
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        Remember back when people said nothing was wrong with Linux gaming and it was actually game studios that had to start developing for Linux so the studios changed their practices and started developing native Linux games? Yeah, me neither.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          33 hours ago

          Because people were still buying the games on Windows. If people start actively not buying things then it encourages change. If people complain but still buy it anyway then nothing will change. Vote with your wallet (which is what OP is doing).

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            03 hours ago

            Voting with your wallet doesn’t work when you’re 3% of the 3%. It didn’t work to get games on Linux and it won’t work to get rid of kernel anticheat. Wanna know what works? Making things work. Like Valve did with Proton while people like OP were voting with their wallet.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              23 hours ago

              So what is your problem with what OP is doing? That they aren’t personally releasing games to compete with the ones using kernel level anti-cheat?

              Like Valve did with Proton while people like OP were voting with their wallet.

              Do you think that was profitable for Steam (from people voting with their wallet), or do you think Steam did it for charity out of the kindness of their hearts?

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                -22 hours ago

                My problem is that being in denial about the state of gaming on Linux (better than before, still garbage) does nothing to improve the state of gaming on Linux.

                Do you think that was profitable for Steam (from people voting with their wallet), or do you think Steam did it for charity out of the kindness of their hearts?

                You seem to think that Valve developed Proton to capture the Linux marketshare. That’s unbelievably naive.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  22 hours ago

                  You seem to think that Valve developed Proton to capture the Linux marketshare. That’s unbelievably naive.

                  Okay, so why did they develop it?

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    -12 hours ago

                    Because Microsoft has the power to end Steam almost overnight so Valve is desperately trying to move people away from Windows. Linux just happened to be a useful tool but Proton aims to capture the Linux userbase about as much as ChromeOS does.