• @LifeOfChance
    link
    266 hours ago

    Honestly, The government isn’t protecting our data anyways so it really doesn’t matter. Amazon has had yet another massive breach but no worries the government is sitting idly by. Not a single action will be taken even though this happens all the time. No penalty means no reason to change.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      53 hours ago

      Is this the Amazon breach you’re talking about?

      https://www.forbes.com/sites/larsdaniel/2024/11/11/amazon-confirms-data-breach-exposed-2800000-lines-of-employee-data/

      I hadn’t heard of it, and I usually follow this stuff pretty closely. FWIW, in this case, it appears that the data was employee data from a third party vendor’s systems:

      The exposed Amazon dataset includes employee work contact information, email addresses, desk phone numbers, and building locations. While Amazon spokesperson Adam Montgomery confirmed the breach, he emphasized in a statement to TechCrunch that core Amazon and Amazon Web Services, or AWS, systems remained secure.

      People misconfigure AWS resources all the time, so it is definitely true that data stored by Amazon leaks out from time to time, although they don’t have much culpability in these cases.

    • @Clinicallydepressedpoochie
      link
      23 hours ago

      The language in the law has nothing to do with data. It’s about foreign nations controlling media narratives.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      176 hours ago

      Yeah, if the government really cared, they would be pushing privacy laws instead of trying to ban a platform.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        74 hours ago

        Yeah…but it’s much easier to get elected with "ChInA bAd!”

        Then “We need a nuanced approach to privacy and social media.”