• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    28
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Insurance companies are taking the risk of offering insurance. That is why they normally make money year after year after year.

    When bad things happen, they take the hits. They take on some debt. They stop making profits… because they decided to purchase the risk from people. That’s the gig.

    There is a middle ground here that doesn’t bone homeowners and doesn’t completely bone the insurance companies affected. They should be taking on debt and making zero profits until they pay it off. That’s not how things work here though, i’m sure they will be bailed out on taxpayer money or something… but what should probably happen is that they should be given a federal loan on pretty favorable terms, something like 1-2% interest, until it’s paid off.

    At the same time standards for homes in areas at risk should be such that fire mitigation is mandated whenever a house changes hands. This will inevitably drive up costs, but again maybe this is another case for low/no interest rate loans to cover the changes. A billion or two today could save 25-100-500++ billion over a few years.

    • @HasturInYellow
      link
      English
      131 month ago

      I am pretty close to the opinion that all private companies need to be abolished and absorbed by collective ownership. There are almost no instances where I can see greed being the secret ingredient that makes things run MORE smoothly.

      • @aliteral
        link
        English
        61 month ago

        Louder for the people on the back, please!

    • Flying Squid
      link
      English
      91 month ago

      There is a middle ground here

      There doesn’t need to be a middle ground. Most developed countries do fine with universal healthcare.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        61 month ago

        You’re not incorrect, though his comment seems specifically targeted at home owners insurance.

        • Flying Squid
          link
          English
          41 month ago

          Again, that could be government-sponsored.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            41 month ago

            Nearly all personal insurance should fundamentally be a government function. Insurance is principally there to assist you when shit goes south. This is also effectively one of the foundational reasons humans collect into societies. But we’ve let runaway American capitalism and abstracting money to the point where it is treated like a resource in an of itself rather than the allocation algorithm it is completely pervert our understanding of how government and private enterprise respectively should interact with society.

        • Flying Squid
          link
          English
          11 month ago

          As I already said, the exact same thing can apply to housing insurance.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 month ago

            Yeah but that isn’t as funny as thinking about a house being sick :(

            I’m at the point where i’m just trying to make light of as much as I can.

    • @kreskin
      link
      English
      61 month ago

      what you dont see is the bailouts when disasters happen. Insurance companies only take the hits for small fires. Not for big ones. The have always made money hand over fist.

    • @ChickenLadyLovesLife
      link
      English
      41 month ago

      That’s not how things work here though, i’m sure they will be bailed out on taxpayer money or something…

      Insurance companies are typically reinsured themselves, so it’s entities like Lloyd’s of London that will ultimately be paying for this.