See title

  • @davidgro
    link
    4
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    Same way it expands to two: When there are three blue eyes, then each of them guesses they might have brown or something and there could be only two blue on the island, in which case as described those two would have left on the second night.

    But they didn’t… So there must be three total. Same with 4, the 3 you can see would have left on night 3 if each of them saw the other two not leave on night 2…

    Leaving or not is the only communication, and what the guru really did was start a timer. It has to start at 1 even though everyone can see that there’s more than one simply due to the constraints of the riddle - if the guru were allowed to say ‘I see at least 50 blue eyed people’ then it would start at 50 because there’s no other fixed reference available. Everyone knows there’s either 99 or 100, but they don’t know which of those it is, so need a way to count to there. They also think everyone else can see anything from 98 to 101 depending, so it’s not as straightforward as thinking the count could start at 99.

    • @FourPacketsOfPeanuts
      link
      47 hours ago

      Same way it expands to two: When there are three blue eyes, then each of them guesses they might have brown or something and there could be only two blue on the island, in which case as described those two would have left on the second night.

      I don’t think that’s right.

      Let’s try it out:

      Basic case: 1 brown, 1 blue. Day 1. Guru says I see someone with blue eyes, blue eye person immediately leaves. End

      Next: 2 brown, 2 blue.
      Day 1; Guru speaks. It doesn’t help anyone immediately because everyone can see a blue eyed person, so no one leaves first night.
      Day 2; The next night, everyone knows this, that everyone else can see a blue eyed person. Which tells the blue eyed people that their eyes are not brown. (They now know no-one is looking at all brown eyes). So the 2 blue eyed people who now realise their eyes aren’t brown leave that night on day 2. The end

      Next case: 3 brown, 3 blue (I’m arbitrarily making brown = blue, I don’t think it actually matters).
      Day 1, guru speaks, no-one leaves.
      Day 2 everyone now knows no-one is looking at all brown. So if anyone could see only 1 other person with blue eyes at this point, they would conclude they themselves have blue. I suppose if you were one of the three blue eyed people you wouldn’t know if the other blue eyed people were looking at 1 blue or more. No-one leaves that night.
      Day 3 I suppose now everyone can conclude that no-one was looking at only 1 blue, everyone can see at least two blue. So if the other blue eyed people can see 2 blues that means you must have blue eyes. So all blue eyed people leave Day 3?

      Hmm. Maybe I’ve talked my way round to it. Maybe this keeps going on, each day without departure eliminating anyone seeing that many blue eyes until you get to 100.

      It just seems so utterly counterintuitive that everyone sits there for 99 nights unable to conclude anything?

      • @davidgro
        link
        25 hours ago

        Yeah. It does seem counterintuitive, but it’s a result of the uncertainty that what they see is what others do. So they have to communicate a number, and the only way they can is leaving or not each night to count up to it.

        I thought about it more and concluded that if the guru had said “I see only blue and brown eyed people” then everyone (but her) could leave the island using the same logic, regardless of how many of each color there was (greater than zero of course because otherwise she wouldn’t see that color). Same for any number of colors too as long as she lists them all and makes it clear that’s all of them and doesn’t include herself.