It’s against the rules of lemmy.world to call for violence against insurance companies, and the people who work for them, so I won’t. But I don’t think it’s against the rules to imply I would if that wasn’t in the rules.
I’m surprised to see this comment and the amount of upvotes.
Doesn’t this break the PC bubble, where every person who works a mediocre job is a good person and no matter how disgusting the company is, you should never take your frustration out on them, yada yada yada.
But if it’s an insurance company it’s okay to commit violence?
Yup, thats it. People are literally saying that its okay to commit violence against anyone who works for any kind of insurance company. Even the cleaners of a home insurance firm.
My point is, seemingly 90% of the American public are so blinded by their views, living in an echo chamber that anything the other side does is bad and everything they say is flawless. It’s fucking madness.
Fair enough, most people tend not to enjoy being incapable of understanding something so very simple. I mean, if you enjoyed that, I can only imagine how much fun you’d have disagreeing with what was actually l being said.
Oh well, I’m glad you’re still managing to find a way to have fun though. Well done you.
Eeeeehhh… depends on negative individual impact on society and personal gain? I think the barely surviving insurance Employee should never be the target, what are you implying here? Have the insurance office shootings already taken over the school shootings? What meta level of could should have we reached to Dodge the ban?
Other people disagree and feel change cannot happen without violence
I said this same thing on another thread regarding why Jan 6 was just a protest and not a violent attack or insurrection or coup and got downvoted to hell.
It’s against the rules of lemmy.world to call for violence against insurance companies, and the people who work for them, so I won’t. But I don’t think it’s against the rules to imply I would if that wasn’t in the rules.
It’s not against the rules to imply that the rules should be different.
Unfortunately it’s the jurisdiction that they operate under that enforce some of those rules.
Because of the implication?
Depends on the moderator. The can say it’s a “call for violence”
Bunch of pussy bullshit
Let Bill do it for you!
Did you know that it’s illegal to say “I want to kill the president of the United States of America”?
Do you think that sketch would be allowed on air these days
sounds like something the whitest kids you know might say.
I’m surprised to see this comment and the amount of upvotes.
Doesn’t this break the PC bubble, where every person who works a mediocre job is a good person and no matter how disgusting the company is, you should never take your frustration out on them, yada yada yada.
But if it’s an insurance company it’s okay to commit violence?
Yup, thats it. People are literally saying that its okay to commit violence against anyone who works for any kind of insurance company. Even the cleaners of a home insurance firm.
Well done you for understanding the situation.
Fuck you lot are a bunch of sour puss losers.
My point is, seemingly 90% of the American public are so blinded by their views, living in an echo chamber that anything the other side does is bad and everything they say is flawless. It’s fucking madness.
No, I got your point. I mocked it because your point was stupid.
Whatever makes you feel better buddy.
You know the funny thing about an argument? From the outside, both parties look like dumb cunts. I’m having fun though, you don’t seem to be.
Good luck to you.
Fair enough, most people tend not to enjoy being incapable of understanding something so very simple. I mean, if you enjoyed that, I can only imagine how much fun you’d have disagreeing with what was actually l being said.
Oh well, I’m glad you’re still managing to find a way to have fun though. Well done you.
I have no idea what you’re talking about. I don’t think anyone has advocated violence here, have they? That’s certainly not in my comment.
Eeeeehhh… depends on negative individual impact on society and personal gain? I think the barely surviving insurance Employee should never be the target, what are you implying here? Have the insurance office shootings already taken over the school shootings? What meta level of could should have we reached to Dodge the ban?
Different people
I believe a revolution that is gained through blood is doomed to become oppressive
Look at China for instance
Other people disagree and feel change cannot happen without violence
France would certainly disagree with that statement.
France had a pretty rough go of things before Napoleon was elected
Then had another rough go of things until Napoleon III died and they abolished the monarchy
I said this same thing on another thread regarding why Jan 6 was just a protest and not a violent attack or insurrection or coup and got downvoted to hell.