I did actually read the article shortly after commenting, but had good reason to believe they would be talking about infants anyway as I’ve some knowledge on the topic. However, the article isn’t very clear that it’s the parents making the decision on behalf of their infant, and reads a bit like the doctors are going ahead and mutilating babies without anyone’s consent. Not that I find it’s any better that parents are consenting on behalf of their children for non-medically necessary surgery.