@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 13 hours agoRednote right nowlemmy.mlimagemessage-square242fedilinkarrow-up1641arrow-down1180file-text
arrow-up1461arrow-down1imageRednote right nowlemmy.ml@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 13 hours agomessage-square242fedilinkfile-text
minus-square@FeathercrownlinkEnglish4•edit-28 hours agoSo is the US, and we still have farms, small businesses, and small factories
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink0•8 hours agoMissing the “child labor” reference on your comment makes it very funny.
minus-square@FeathercrownlinkEnglish1•7 hours agoI mean, the US has that too. My point is that a nation being rich really doesn’t prevent having those businesses or using them for child labor at all.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•7 hours agoI got it, but it’s sounds like the US have small (in size) businesses and factories, not that small business and factories use child labor.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•7 hours ago So is the US, and we still have farms, small businesses, and small factories I think it should be “and we still have child labor in farms, small businesses…” Without the “child labor in” the comment sounds funny to me.
So is the US, and we still have farms, small businesses, and small factories
Missing the “child labor” reference on your comment makes it very funny.
I mean, the US has that too. My point is that a nation being rich really doesn’t prevent having those businesses or using them for child labor at all.
I got it, but it’s sounds like the US have small (in size) businesses and factories, not that small business and factories use child labor.
Both are true. What’s your point?
I think it should be “and we still have child labor in farms, small businesses…”
Without the “child labor in” the comment sounds funny to me.
Ok