• archomrade [he/him]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    011 hours ago

    less than half indicated that they were definitively not cisgender

    It is just as accurate to say that less than half indicated that they definitively are cisgender - it depends on if you include questioning individuals is a part of the culturally dominant majority cisgender group, or if you view the questioning of your socially-reinforced gender as a departure from the norm.

    Hexbear, per prolewiki has “over 1,400 monthly users”.

    A sample group of 42% in any survey would be considered a high-quality representation, even when including the likelihood of response bias. But, then again, there’s still even less evidence for assuming it’s inaccurate simply because trans and communist identities are extremely uncommon in the general population - especially when hexbear is explicitly a trans-friendly leftist space.

    • @lemonmelon
      link
      English
      511 hours ago

      Of course it can be. But the viewpoint called into question is “I don’t believe that half the users are trans”. Based on the data you personally referenced, that is a valid viewpoint for someone to hold without telling anyone who identifies specifically as trans that they are wrong about their gender.

      Further, 598 is not 42% of “over 1,400”.

      • archomrade [he/him]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -210 hours ago

        that is a valid viewpoint for someone to hold without telling anyone who identifies specifically as trans that they are wrong about their gender.

        It’s not a matter of opinion - either you’re interpreting that demographic survey and excluding the 10% who are not sure if they are trans or not, or you’re questioning the accuracy of the poll based on response bias or some other reason you’re not mentioning. Saying “I don’t believe this figure” isn’t born out of a reaction to that information, it’s simply an expression of disbelief that there could possibly be that many trans communists in a community you personally dislike.

        Further, 598 is not 42% of “over 1,400”.

        Ok… so what would you say is a reasonable estimate, then? 40%? 35%? Those are still very high sample rates