You’d think a hegemony with a 100-years tradition of upkeeping democracy against major non-democratic players, would have some mechanism that would prevent itself from throwing down it’s key ideology.

Is it really that the president is all that decides about the future of democracy itself? Is 53 out of 100 senate seats really enough to make country fall into authoritarian regime? Is the army really not constitutionally obliged to step in and save the day?

I’d never think that, of all places, American democracy would be the most volatile.

  • 100
    link
    fedilink
    411 hours ago

    this is why giving too much power to a single position within gov is not a great idea

    • @FourPacketsOfPeanuts
      link
      58 hours ago

      When a population give a party control of the senate, congress and the presidency that’s the public disabling a lot of checks and balances…