• @PugJesusOPM
    link
    English
    201 day ago

    Explanation: In the past, PTSD was not necessarily well-known - while some of the symptoms were intermittently recognized by cultures throughout the years, there was never a particularly clear conception of PTSD like we have today, nor a united approach towards dealing with it. Things were particularly stark in WW1, as serious approaches towards mental health were beginning to emerge in modern states… just as officers sent mentally broken troops back into the trenches, or even executed them for daring to have breakdowns in the middle of a war.

    By WW2, things were far from perfect (and things are honestly still pretty fucked today), but there was at least the recognition that PTSD was a serious condition that was not just some moral failing on a soldier’s part. Unless you were Patton, but fuck Patton, that prick.

    • snooggums
      link
      English
      723 hours ago

      I heard it was just hard men making hard decisions!

      Patton was further heard by war correspondent Noel Monks angrily claiming that shell shock is “an invention of the Jews.”

      Oh good grief.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      321 hours ago

      Unless you were Patton, but fuck Patton, that prick.

      Yeah… It’s always weird to see a man so clearly from a different era in modern combat. It kinda makes sense that he would think you slap the PTSD out of a man, it was probably the recommended treatment when he first joined. I mean when he started his career, just traveling in a motorized vehicle was like the peak of military tech.