• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -1811 days ago

    It’s not totally insane reasoning but, like, people can just downvote links to Twitter if they want to, and/or use an extension to automatically redirect to a Nitter instance. The only people actually affected by censoring Twitter community-wide is those who would want to look at the context.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          210 days ago

          I stopped using twitter way longer than that, tbh I’m basically gone from most social media

          Twitter used to be more interesting and I talked with a lot of people. Nowadays it’s pretty devoid

    • @Feathercrown
      link
      English
      511 days ago

      Or those who don’t want to see it but aren’t technical or motivated enough to fix it themselves

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -1011 days ago

        I think it’s way worse to keep information from someone who wants to see it, than to let it be seen by someone who would prefer not to see it but isn’t motivated enough to do something about it. Sort of by construction, actually - if the latter category really didn’t want to see Twitter links, they would have done it themselves.

        • @Feathercrown
          link
          English
          1011 days ago

          I think keeping fascist content away from unsuspecting people is good, actually

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            011 days ago

            …we’re talking about a ban of links to Twitter on a gaming subreddit. Those links would be to, like, game news. That’s not “fascist content”.

            • @Feathercrown
              link
              English
              611 days ago

              Fair, but the website still promotes it and requires you to log in to see the link contents, thus exposing you to the other content.