You’d think a hegemony with a 100-years tradition of upkeeping democracy against major non-democratic players, would have some mechanism that would prevent itself from throwing down it’s key ideology.

Is it really that the president is all that decides about the future of democracy itself? Is 53 out of 100 senate seats really enough to make country fall into authoritarian regime? Is the army really not constitutionally obliged to step in and save the day?

I’d never think that, of all places, American democracy would be the most volatile.

  • @SocialMediaRefugee
    link
    151 month ago

    You can impeach a president for any reason. You don’t need a crime or such committed, all you need is congress to do it.

    Be careful what you wish for though since the other party could do “tit for tat” with the president you support.

    • thermal_shock
      link
      English
      31
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      not like it changed, he was impeached twice, didn’t mean shit. he’s a felonious racist rapist, doesn’t mean shit.

      USA made this bed, now we fucking lie in it.

      • @mipadaitu
        link
        English
        51 month ago

        The house voted on impeachment, but the senate has to remove him, or decide on a punishment.

        If it was bad enough (by that, I mean if he starts taking away the ability for the senate to have power) then he would be removed.

        • @Maggoty
          link
          01 month ago

          And then he instead advocates that senators should be moved into the House of Representatives. The House thinks it’s great. So they never start an impeachment.

    • @dx1
      link
      121 month ago

      That gets to the root of the problem. We have “checks and balances” designed around the idea that separate institutions would check the excesses of each other. Even if you don’t accept the “Republicans and Democrats work for the same people” theory, well, now all three branches of government are majority Republican, and not even in a way where there’s significant internal division or strife, so it’s just a bulldozer. The stupidity of not including popular recall votes in the Constitution - or really, just not having a mechanism for popular referendums, vetoes, etc. - is I think its biggest fault. The “representative democracy” model is inherently flawed because you can corrupt representatives, while corrupting an entire population, while not impossible, is a hell of a lot harder.

      • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed
        link
        fedilink
        English
        141 month ago

        Check and Balance was intened to stop bad individuals, not an entire political party working in unison to destroy the system.

        • @dx1
          link
          10
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Honestly, no amount of careful planning and constitutional design will restrain a society where enough people have gone completely insane. Look at “Israel”. Even 100% direct democracy there would still be a genocidal nightmare. Gets to the problem of how culture is the real driver behind the shape of society. And in that case, how religion incinerates real morality.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      51 month ago

      Be careful what you wish for though

      No, I’m calling BS. They’ll impeach anyone they think they can get away with it on. They investigated the shit out of Biden. They’re not being held back by some for of fear of tit for tat decorum. That’s wildly inaccurate.

      For it to succeed, it would require congress to agree which they won’t because they’re conspiriting. And if it did get him out, then we get Vance who is also a Nazi. Protest, Resist, put up an fight, and wait in hopes that he’s bad enough that the right and left people can field some half decent candidates and stop being nazi’s

      Alternatively, we’re now making/selling a lot of armbands.