You’d think a hegemony with a 100-years tradition of upkeeping democracy against major non-democratic players, would have some mechanism that would prevent itself from throwing down it’s key ideology.

Is it really that the president is all that decides about the future of democracy itself? Is 53 out of 100 senate seats really enough to make country fall into authoritarian regime? Is the army really not constitutionally obliged to step in and save the day?

I’d never think that, of all places, American democracy would be the most volatile.

    • @Gammelfisch
      link
      1611 days ago

      That mofo made it to the $20 bill. Sick.

      • @febra
        link
        511 days ago

        Actively spreading hate towards the LGBTQ community and making some of the most marginalised people isn’t nazi enough for you? What a sick world we live in.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          19 days ago

          I would agree that Nazis were anti-gay. Is anyone anti-gay a Nazi? What’s your definition of Nazi?

          • @febra
            link
            19 days ago

            Anyone anti gay is a fascist.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          011 days ago

          This very liberal use of Nazi and fascist as a epithet has devalued its meaning.

          Hate is not enough. The Nazis did far more than spread hate. National-Socialism was much more coherent and thought through ideology than Trumpism/MAGA is today.

          Nazi might be useful as an expression of anger and resentment, but it’s not conducive to serious analysis or discourse regarding the situation.